Matthew Pitt (With PokerNews buddies) |
You can learn more about Matthew Pitt at his blog. (Did I link to it correctly? SEO donk here).
Thanks to Matt, and here he is:
As someone who has worked in the poker industry for several
years now I thought it would be a good idea to write a guest post for Barry
Carter that fits in with his series on poker media industry articles.
Barry recently wrote an article entitled “How Do Poker MediaWebsites Make Money?” and within this article he mentioned terms such as
pay-per-click and touched on the subject that a writer's employer may not care
much for the quality of the content a writer produces because he is looking
purely at how many customers click a specific link within the content provided.
One way you can help your articles become more useful to your employer is to
employ some basic SEO, that is Search Engine Optimisation, to your content.
The first thing you need to realise is that, in the poker
industry especially, Google rules the world. Forget all the rubbish Bing and
other search engines try to push on you about them being the best search engine
or the most accurate etc Google is the daddy, the head honcho. You are at the
mercy of Google and its unknown search algorithms. You are Google's bitch. You
no longer search for something on the internet, you Google it; so does your mum
and possibly your gran. Google makes the world spin around and being ranked
number 1 in Google for a specific term is like holding the Holy Grail in your
hands. Think about it. How often do you Google something and simply click the
first answer without even looking or thinking about it? Exactly.
The way Google works is down to a number of secret
algorithms that work in unison to create an extremely powerful search engine.
Regardless if you think it is the best, the most accurate, the fastest or
whatever, Google is the industry standard search engine. Although these
algorithms are top secret, there are a few assumptions you can make about how
Google works and how it ranks content it finds on the world wide web.
- Google loves new, fresh content
- Google knows how to read bold and italicised text.
- Google likes it when content links to other highly ranked content
- Google is happy when your article has some relevant keywords naturally occurring in your content
- Google smiles when your headline is related to your content
- Google gets mad when you blatantly copy other articles
- Google starts to cry when you link to poor ranking content
- Google does not like you trying to force readers to click links
- Google gets royally pissed off when you try to force keywords down readers throats
There are scores of others but those mentioned above are
probably the most common and the ones you have the most control over. As you can
see Google is almost like a living, breathing entity that adapts and evolves to
bring what it determines is the best content for a person to read, watch etc.
It is up to you (and your editor) to keep Google happy.
One of my first jobs in the poker media was to provide copy
based on keywords. For months on end I used to churn out articles for some
major sites based on keywords I had been given. For example, I would be asked
to write a 400-word article about anything I wished as long as it mentioned
“poker bankroll management” at least five times somewhere within those 400
words. Sometimes the keywords were perfectly reasonable but then they started
to become a little obscure. I distinctly remember having to write a 400-word
article that said “poker play online free” at least eight times. You try and fit
that non-English rubbish into an article once never mind eight times. I bet
Google hated those articles!
After writing between 500-750 of these I now automatically
think of keywords whenever I am writing articles, whether the articles are news
related or promotional material. A large percentage of the articles I write are
poker-related and I know dozens of keywords and phrases that people use to
search for other poker related material. In recent weeks I have described
someone being dealt pocket aces as “Player A was dealt the best starting hand
in Hold'em, pocket aces, and three-bet all-in” or something similar. That small
sentence will rank in Google for terms such as:
·
What is the best starting hand in Hold'em?
·
Are aces the best Hold'em hand?
·
How to play pocket aces
·
How often will you get dealt pocket aces?
·
What is a three-bet?
Those five bullet points are all valid questions Joe Bloggs
could type into Google and find my article with. Hopefully he will then read
the rest of it, click a link to an online poker site and keep my bosses happy!
Emphasising your text by making it bold is another way to
ensure Google picks up your content. At PokerNews I always write a player's
full name in bold in news articles and keywords in bold in promotional
articles. For example, “Get involved in this value-added promotion where
we have six freerolls each with a $5,000 prize pool.” Google will
read the bold text, think it is important and if someone searches for keywords
such as “value-added freeroll” or “freerolls with large prize pools” guess
which article it is going to bring up or at least consider bringing up for
searchers.
By now you have probably cottoned on that SEO is mainly
common sense and that continues when you want to link to other content. When
you link to a specific article, particularly one that is not hosted on your
site, Google goes all warm and fuzzy inside because you are essentially
vouching for that site and spreading the love. If that site has linked to other
“good” sites and they are themselves linked to then Google gives you some extra
points (in secret of course) and ranks you higher. This is why I get frustrated when sites copy
my work or use it to create articles of their own and do not credit me. I have
written articles in the past that were exclusive to me yet they have ended up
on a rival site a few hours later and complete with spelling mistakes! Had they
copied it and said, “according to UK PokerNews” with a link to the original
article Google would have been over the moon and given them a hug. Instead
Google will have marked them down for being plagiarisers and possibly future
articles they write by themselves will be marked down too. I give credit all of
the time whenever I use a site such as Blonde Poker or the PokerStars Blog for
tournament reports and live updates. Give credit where it is due.
Last but not least, and following in the same link-related
vein, is linking to content naturally. Whenever you link to something you want
downloading, reading etc you have to try and make Google you are just
suggesting your reader should click. Terms with links in such as “click here”
or “read more here” do not impress Google because you are essentially forcing
your readers to click a link. What if they didn't want to click a link and they
just wanted to carry on reading your article? You are now dictating to your
reader what they have to do. Not good.
Imagine you are writing an article about Jake Cody going
deep in yet another tournament and whilst talking about him you happy to
mention he is a Triple Crown winner. “Jake Cody, one of only four Triple Crown
winners, has once against gone deep in a PokerStars.com European Poker Tour
event.” I happen to know that I wrote an article when Cody completed his Triple
Crown so I can link to that article by using the keywords “Triple Crown.” This
merely suggests to the reader that if they click that link on the words “Triple
Crown” they are going to be directed to another article about the said Triple
Crown. Doing so makes Google so happy that it does a little dance. You should
see what Google does if you provide a natural link on a certain keyword that
has bold text; I think when this happens a fairy gets its wings.
The ins and outs of SEO can be quite complicated and much of
SEO is theory. Nobody knows the algorithms Google uses so it is all trial and
error but by following the hints and tips above you should be able to keep Google
happy for the time being and if Google is happy with you then your boss usually
is too.
0 comments:
Post a Comment