I have my biggest week of the year so far, job wise, starting tomorrow. I don't believe in fate or destiny or any of that sort of stuff, but as coinkidinks go this was impressive. Pokernews have a big involvement with the 48 Hour PartyPoker Big Game in London this week and I am going down to be the man on the floor this week. We are sponsoring a portion of the event and I will be there trying to get a few scoops (Big one obviously being Isildur1 and if he shows).
I mentioned in the last post that I think this event will be a big landmark in the TV poker legacy and I mean it, so I am very excited to be part of it and uber excited that Pokernews branding will be all over it when it comes on Channel 5 later on this year. Its kept me busy and the one downer is that its a week I wont be working on my book with Jared Tendler.
However, by sheer coincidence, his most well known client Dusty Schmidt is coming over for the event and Jared is coming with him. Ok it isnt coincidence that much, I put Jared in touch with Jesse May who in turn put Dusty in contact with him, but its still very odd. Despite being very good friends for 8 months and having grinded a book out with him for the last 4, I have never met Jared in person until tomorrow.
The internet is a weird thing, I have several friends via poker that I would vouch for, lend money to etc whom I have never (or rarely) met in person. Things like skype, facebook and MSN allow us to skip the whole chore of actually going somewhere to see someone in real life. I'm really looking forward to it though, hopefully the start of many real life meetings.
I swear to god I could be a poker agent. In the one week Jared and Dusty are here I have arranged them two magazine interviews, two TV interviews and Jared is a guest speaker at the Bluff Europe Academy. I remember Julian Thew said to me recently "why do I need an agent if I know the person to speak to?" and he was on to something, as for the most part it was just a case of ringing and emailing people I know. Probably shouldnt under sell it like that, just in case anyone wants to pay me to do it in the future.
So I really hope I can either be the first person to report a sighting of or announce the identity of Isildur1. Its TV pokers first cliffhanger and its not only a step in the direction of Darts, its a step towards the WWE - no complaints here because I am afraid Wrestling is a guilty pleasure of mine. We will be doing semi-live-twitter-esque updates on Pokernews HERE as well as interviews and reports at pokernews.com from Sunday.
But tonight I am off to see Sean Lock with the missus, he is my current favourite comedian and after the disappointment that was Eddie Izzard, I need to have my faith in stand up comedy restored.
The armed robbery at EPT Berlin is probably the biggest story in poker I have had to work on since I became a poker journalist. Don’t get me wrong, from an industry point of view there have been lots of bigger stories within poker – the November Nine, Chris Moneymaker winning the Main Event, the UIGEA and the Superuser Scandal all spring to mind. But in terms of attracting mainstream media coverage worldwide I think this was the biggest during my time in the Industry.
The security of the event has come into question, as you would expect it to whenever something like this happens. I for one wasn’t there, so I will not speculate about how prepared or unprepared the Grand Hyatt Hotel and the EPT were for such an incident, I think my colleagues over at Pokernews.com are in a better position to do that. The one thing this did immediately make me think about, however, was how we poker players often treat large sums of money with quite reckless abandonment.
I am not trying to say anyone who played EPT Berlin was taking a massive risk in doing so, not at all. I just found myself explaining how live poker tournaments and buying in worked to a bunch of non poker playing friends who had caught the news. Although obviously biased by the weekends story, they were quite alarmed by how we often walk around with big sums of money in our pockets and also surprised that something like this didn’t happen much more often.
But that appears to have clouded our judgement towards money in general. As Stuart Rutter put it brilliantly in his recent column, there have been so many times where poker players will have been incredibly vulnerable with large sums of money. Whether that’s waiting in line to pay into a big buy-in tournament, lending money to players you don’t truly know that well, playing self deal games or agreeing to buy a piece of someone in a tournament.Poker players live in a unique bubble, especially where money is concerned. Money is not treated like something we use to pay our bills, feed our kids and buy life’s little luxuries, it’s used as a way of keeping score, of determining whether we are winning or losing players. This attitude, although alien to people outside of poker, is correct in the context of the game, because over attachment to money will inhibit a players ability to make profitable decisions at the table.
I’m as guilty as anyone of being prepared to do poker transactions without much research, ones that I would never dream of doing in any other realm of life. I’ve bought percentages in people I have never met, swapped stars money for tilt with acquaintances I couldn’t really call proper friends and engaged in the daft prop bet or two. If a mutual acquaintance outside of poker asked to lend money from me I would say 100% no, but if a mutual poker acquaintance wanted $500 Stars for $500 Tilt, I would ask no further questions than their screen name and the city they are from (Thankfully I still say no all the time if a poker player ever asked to borrow money from me).
And I’ve been burned a few times too. I have been grimmed by horses I have staked without doing the appropriate research beforehand and I have done work for poker magazines that promised me riches but who never ever planned on paying me. I have also had several, one successful, attempts on my online poker accounts by key loggers wanting to joyride with my bankroll. As much as I love this game and this industry I have also seen more than its fair share of theft, scams, staking requests gone sour, fly by night poker companies not paying the bills and much worse.
Poker players have a flippant attitude towards money which is why I think that they are the ideal pray for armed robbers or fraudsters. Whether that means the EPT Berlin Robbery was destined to happen I have no idea, but if nothing else we should all use it as a lesson so that it doesn’t happen again. We need to start recognising that poker is a very vulnerable and largely unregulated industry, one which despite this vulnerability most of its participants walk around with such a carefree attitude towards money that would make you think they were in Fort Knox.
We need to start taking more responsibility for our own money, our personal and financial security and the integrity of the game. We need to be much more careful with our money, be much more scrutinous of whom we transact with and insist upon higher standards in the places we play poker. Ultimately the blame for this incident lies with the dangerous men who carried it out, but we can all take steps to make sure things like this it don’t happen again.







.jpg)
.jpg)